No, this is not Recordism... (the following link)
http://www.recordism.org/2008/09/what-is-recordism_14.html
So, uh, this person couldn't do a Google search to see if someone might already be using the term? No alarm bells went off when recordism.com was already registered?
WTF???!!!
- William A. Davison (humble originator of the one-and-only true Recordism, 25 years and going strong - AND online since 1999 I might add! harumph)
39 minutes ago
cavallerae28094slme28094gammmimg01.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
3 comments:
WTF! You're absolutely right William!
lez burn it down, i try my best today...
Thanks for the heads-up!
VIVA trusted Recordism!!
i have been told this in response:
"All words are subject to the possibility of polysemy; especially words that are mainly used to describe obscure artistic movements."
i said:(not approved comment)
"ok, what for if not the point"
Once upon a time, oh so many decades ago, I was a Socialist Anarchist. It was not an obscure artistic movement. The term/movement/intent has now been enslaved and obfuscated by a right wing political 'ideology'.
I could list so many terms and ideologies, such as 'Right to life', that have been stolen and redefined to suit other intents.
I do not appreciate Monsewer's "[...] especially words that are mainly used to describe obscure artistic movements." Ah, yes. He may be articulate but he cannot be forgiven for his colouring artistic movements pejorative.
Post a Comment